January 7th, 2016
onaissues
For all its reported struggles with growth, Twitter still has the rare privilege of being a destination—a platform that people check frequently and repeatedly, from which they find other things. People are linking to images on Twitter? Let’s incorporate images! People are watching YouTube videos from Facebook? Let’s host videos of our own. People are reading articles from the feed? Let’s… put articles in the feed! Platforms are markets; they research themselves. It’s a great setup for the platforms! And one that Twitter has embraced enthusiastically, gradually assembling a service out of features conceived and tested by users and (mostly now defunct) third parties. (Down to its logo. Down to its verbs!)
 
So the capability to post longer text posts that expand inside the feed seems especially notable because posts can be counted in characters, and Twitter is known for its character count. But a feed in which you can already tap “play” or open a grid of photos into a slideshow or open a link into an internal browser is a feed in which tapping a text preview to see more text will feel natural. It won’t take long, I imagine, for links to start to feel almost out of place—for Twitter to feel a bit more like Instagram, where users frequently write blog-length captions, and where the links and the web effectively don’t exist.

Better as a Tweet - The Awl

In his latest on the Content Wars, John Herrman explores how 10,000-character tweets might change the way readers and journalists relate to the platform.

(Source: The Awl)

December 8th, 2015
onaissues
Journalists who interact with their followers are seen as more credible and rated more positively than journalists who use Twitter solely to disseminate news and information, Jahng and Littau found.
November 18th, 2015
onaissues

There’s more than one way to skin a cat … and to tweet a story

socialmediadesk:

I’m not sure if I’ve ever written this anywhere but I know I’ve said it many times to many different people over the years:

Headline plus link is not the best way to share your story.

We’re guilty of doing this, especially on the main @NPR Twitter account, however, this isn’t a model I’d recommend following.

On social platforms, we emphasize the importance of being human. Tweeting a headline (and only a headline) is lazy and looks automated. Instead, share what’s interesting. Explain to your followers why they should read your story. Tease out shareable quotes or facts that may resonate with different segments of the audience.

imageYou can’t “catch” everyone with one approach. To really get your story out there to the wider audience these days, you should be sharing it in a number of different ways and multiple times. It’s okay to tweet your story more than once! Look at how the NYT tweeted this story multiple times. (H/T Camila Domonske.)

A word of caution: You should share your stories multiple times, but thoughtfully and with respect for your audience. This means that you should not repeat yourself, nor should you only use a platform as a megaphone. You must tweet other things and engage in other ways, too.

One great thing we can all do is share the work of our peers. Over the years, we’ve all been cultivating our own social audiences. While the main NPR Twitter account has an astounding 4.5 million followers, each of us has a different, unique audience who we engage with more directly. Our smaller, individual audiences don’t mirror the overall NPR audience. Our audiences are more diverse and reach far wider.

Scott Montgomery recently sent a note out to the newsroom to encourage folks to share NPR’s special visual presentation of the rain forest deforestation taking place in Brazil. The idea was to activate the audiences of our reporters and editors on Twitter and have the project reach a larger audience.

Serri Graslie collected a lot of these tweets and it’s really interesting to see the different ways each of you shared the project. See more here.

Was this successful? I don’t have the data in front of me to clearly say so or not, but that’s neither here nor there. The heart of the matter is that we worked together to share the important journalism we’re is doing - and each of us had a different way of doing it.

Let’s do more of that.

Loading tweets...

@ONA

There are any number of pressing media issues in the digital age -- we're sure you can come up with a handful without breaking a sweat. ONA Issues is your platform to define them, share them, explore them and get a better fix on how they impact the work you do. Here we'll look to you for your perspectives and conversations and help jump-start discussions by posting insightful reporting, commentary and analysis from anywhere and everywhere. We're here to listen and learn. Join us.

Networks