If there’s an error of fact, publications may amend the digital text and add a correction, usually at the bottom of the Web page. Editors often put through non-factual changes without bothering to notify readers at all. Rarely do corrections or clarifications carry any kind of explanation: how the reporter got the wrong vote count for an important bill; why the editor decided that the penultimate paragraph wasn’t really necessary. There’s a stunning lack of transparency.
While my personal capacity to tell technology stories in the past year has diversified, I’ve noticed something: my beat is rapidly disappearing.
Dave Lee, technology reporter for the BBC
Technology journalists are facing extinction — Medium
(Source: medium.com)
Josh Stearns shares his favorite digital journalism from 2013. What would you add to this list?
Across all our countries, the under 35 age group overwhelming prefer online and interactive news, while the older half of the population prefer TV, radio and print. That underlies the big dilemma news organisations face – they can’t turn off the old ways of delivering news, but they have to embrace the new at the same time. That is expensive and hard to do culturally as you need new skills.
Nic Newman, author of the Reuters Digital Report, which is set to be released Thursday at #GEN13.

(via ianhillmedia)
Did you produce amazing digital journalism in the past year? Submit to the Online Journalism Awards. ONA is now accepting entries and we want to see your best work.
Nine of the 29 awards come with a total of $37,500 in prize money, courtesy of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and the Gannett Foundation, including a new $5,000 award honoring the best in Watchdog Journalism.
Looking for inspiration? Check out the full list of winners and finalists for the 2012 Online Journalism Awards.
